<img class="alignleft size-thumbnail wp-image-7113" title="balance 2" src="http://leadchangegroup.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/balance-2-125x125.jpg" alt="" width="125" height="125" />

After some tweet and email discussions with <a href="http://www.princeton.edu/~slaughtr/" target="_blank">Anne Marie Slaughter</a> and <a href="http://www.forbes.com/sites/work-in-progress/2012/07/02/my-personal-you-cant-have-it-all-moment-last-week/" target="_blank">Cali Williams Yost</a> about Anne Marie’sarticle on <a href="http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2012/07/why-women-still-can-8217-t-have-it-all/9020/" target="_blank">The Atlantic</a>, and the uproar about Marissa Mayer becoming Yahoo’s CEO while she is pregnant, I decided to weigh in.  Finally, we are having an honest discussion of “having it all” instead of perpetuating a fairly tale.  While this has mainly been viewed as a ‘woman’s’ issue, it is a very human issue.

The phrase “having it all” is a huge part of the problem.  First, no human being can have it all, regardless of gender. Read the full article <a href="http://mills-scofield.com/blog/2012/8/13/i-dont-have-it-all-yeah.html">here</a>.