Hi, Paul - fascinating essay and an interesting way to consider leadership.

I was struck by several of your examples, especially the mention of Winston Churchill, who definitely did not exhibit a consistently "upward" career trajectory.  I think we sometimes give too much weight to a corporate-style leadership arc, where each year  brings a smoothly ascending series of assignments, accomplishments, and titles.  Most folks do not enjoy the classic career model of always doing and earning more, so the concept that sometimes things go up, but sometimes they go down or even off in a totally new direction is useful to keep in mind.

You also correctly point out the smaller acts of leadership and character at earlier ages which contribute to larger accomplishments at a later date.  This is why teachers and others who work with young people have power and potential beyond what we usually give them credit for.

I do have a quibble of sorts:  Some of your examples of leadership seem more acts of heroism (Cpt. Sullenberg and Ms Nepali).  Both are heartwarming and breath-taking examples of human accomplishment and overcoming of fear in very scary situations, but I question whether they really are leadership, other than simply by example.

Thanks so much for sharing your thoughts here, Paul.  I'll be sharing this thought-provoking article with others.

John