All profit and growth are not necessarily "good" either.  That's why classifying <em>leadership</em> is so difficult.  I'd say this was more of an <em>effective</em> leadership example in that they are effective in creating their desired outcome (profits and growth) but they don't create a <em>good</em> and sustainable outcome as evidenced by the high turnover and low morale.  At least that was what I intended in making the original distinction.  I don't think it's ultimately good that no one wants to work for you or that the people who do have their lives ruined due to not being treated well.